handling, suspension, throttle response, etc (all the "M-goodies")...yes all that can be done aftermarket on a 135i, but then again...why not just get an s2000/sti/evo then if it's all about tunability, bang for your bunch, and hp's...because it's a BMW right? The same premise can be applied to an M to an non M. I'm not saying the non M models are inferior, but don't just look at the numbers when comparing...

how about the 535i v 550 discussion all over again....same thing, different model


yes they do, but I still find it flattering to "M" models how they are "benchmark" for some owners in that same model line



***both are great vehicles in their own right, justifying spending or not spending your money on either model is a debate that personal preference should always take precedence

 

You'll end up spending more money to make a regular car perform like an M in all aspect once all's said and done PERIOD

 

some people end up trading up for an M after all the mods

 

As mentioned, BMW is ALWAYS conservative with their 0-60 ratings. Plus they always make sure the pecking order is preserved. I think the M3 was rated at 4.7?? They can't rate the 1M faster than the M3 but we all know the M3 is faster than 4.7. I've seen a Z4 35i test at 4.3 to 60 yet BMW rates it at 4.9 to 60.

I have no doubt it will be plenty quick and great handling. Just how great is to be seen.

 

M3 vs C63 vs RS4 - The C63 has the most HP.


I'll take the modest increase in HP with the decrease in weight.

 

Can't argue with you there

Any mods planned for the M3 yet btw?

Good point

 

mostly cosmetic V...I do have almost all the parts already sitting in my garage tho

 

LOL so you're still spending money on mods - M or not

 

that's a given

especially around here...

 

Vorsteiner front lip in the works?