nola530

BP comment about 'small people' causes anger
Published: Wednesday, June 16, 2010, 3:10 PM Updated: Wednesday, June 16, 2010, 3:31 PM
The Associated Press

The BP chairman's comment that the oil giant cares about "the small people" received an icy reception today from residents along the Gulf Coast impacted by the massive oil spill.


The Associated Press BP Chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg, left, poses for photographs with CEO Tony Hayward in London in this file photo.
BP Chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg told reporters in Washington: "I hear comments sometimes that large oil companies are greedy companies or don't care, but that is not the case with BP. We care about the small people."

Justin Taffinder of New Orleans was not amused.

"We're not small people. We're human beings. They're no greater than us. We don't bow down to them. We don't pray to them," Taffinder said.

Svanberg is Swedish, and his comments may have been an unintentional slight. But coastal residents are angry over the oil spill disaster and at BP CEO Tony Hayward's comments that he "wants his life back."

Terry Hanners, who is retired from state and federal law enforcement and has a small construction company in Gulf Shores, Ala., said the "small people" remark revealed something about BP's frame of mind.

"These BP people I've met are good folks. I've got a good rapport with them," said Hanners, 74. "But BP does not care about us. They are so far above us. We are the nickel-and-dime folks of this world."

Asked about the BP chairman's remark, BP spokesman Toby Odone told The Associated Press in an e-mail that "it is clear that what he means is that he cares about local businesses and local people. This was a slip in translation."



© 2010 NOLA.com. All rights reserved.

pjinca

Eesh, they keep digging their hole deeper and deeper don't they? What's next? "Let them eat cake!!!"

nola530

if they even know what that means. these guys are just dumb. gives me hope that I'll be the CEO of a world wide company one day.

pjinca

Why not? You can't possibly do a worse job, heck they may be taking apps at BP shortly

pjinca

Nola530, this one's for you (good news when you need it)
Critic


"The president has told Mabus to work with fishermen, small businesses, and environmentalists -- as well as state officials -- to design the plan. That's a long-term solution to a long-term problem. Our Gulf Coast supplies America with food and energy, not to mention great music and irreplaceable culture. It will take years to undo the damage."

nola530

ya i read that. i love james c., even met him a few times up at LSU. This is some good news, but with everything down here we just have to wait and see. I heard that P&J seafood, a 134 year old company that mainly does oysters, is going to try shipping them in from Cali just to help keep the doors open and people employed. I dont even know how to feel about that, I mean, we have some of the best oysters here in south LA, but shipping in oysters from cali is just strange. Not wrong, but strange.
on a another note, "google chris rose new orleans", this guy has some funny takes on nola. kinda sums up how we feel.

nola530

:thumbsdown:

A yachting trip? The 10 worst BP gaffes in Gulf oil spill.

By Mark Sappenfield Mark Sappenfield Sun Jun 20, 8:14 am ET

The decision by BP Chief Executive Tony Hayward to spend a day with his family in England Saturday was perhaps defensible. Two months into the Gulf oil spill, some Americans might grudgingly admit that even a man charged with solving the worst environmental crisis in US history needed a day here or there to recharge the batteries.

The fact he spent that day yachting with his son in an exclusive race off the English coast was perhaps the starkest evidence yet of the BP chief?s deep misunderstanding of American public opinion ? or his dismissal of it.

It is possible that, in the eyes of Americans, BP can't do anything right until it plugs the hole gushing tens of thousands of barrels of oil a day into the Gulf of Mexico.

Yet since the Deepwater Horizon blowout April 20, BP has hardly helped itself. Mr. Hayward?s day of yachting off the Isle of Wight ? mere days after he appeared at once elusive and disinterested at congressional hearings ? is the latest in a series of major public relations mistakes that have at times cast BP as bumbling, ill-informed, and callous.

1. Who?s in charge? On Friday, BP board Chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg presented the news that many Americans had long been waiting for. Hayward was being shunted out of his lead role in the Gulf oil spill crisis, to be replaced by BP Managing Director Bob Dudley. On Saturday, BP media relations personnel said the chairman of the board was wrong. They said Mr. Svanberg was suggesting that BP was merely beginning a long-planned and gradual transition of authority to Mr. Dudley ?over a period of time.?

Click image to see more photos from the Gulf oil spill

AP

2. The ?small people? It was not the first time Svanberg misspoke. After meeting with President Obama, Svanberg said he shared Mr. Obama?s compassion for the ?small people? in the Gulf. Needless to say, the comment did not go over well. Spoken by a man who owns a yacht in Thailand, the phrase ?small people? smelled of rank class condescension. Swedes, however, note that the word ?småfolket? in Svanberg?s native Swedish has a positive connotation with undertones of egalitarianism.

3. ?I want my life back? Six weeks after the Deepwater Horizon blowout, Hayward uttered these words: ?We're sorry for the massive disruption it's caused their lives. There's no one who wants this over more than I do. I'd like my life back.? To those shrimpers and fishermen who have essentially lost an entire year?s wages ? not to mention the families of the 11 men killed in the blowout ? this seemed an inordinately insensitive comment.

Moreover, it has now become the prism for Hayward?s yachting excursion. White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said on ABC?s ?This Week? Sunday: ?Well, to quote Tony Hayward, he?s got his life back, as he would say. And I think we can all conclude that Tony Hayward is not going to have a second career in PR consulting.?

4. ?Very, very modest? impact On May 18 ? a month after the blowout ? Hayward told the BBC: "I think the environmental impact of this disaster is likely to have been very, very modest." Four days earlier, he told the British newspaper, the Guardian: "The Gulf of Mexico is a very big ocean. The amount of volume of oil and dispersant we are putting into it is tiny in relation to the total water volume."

The first has proven to be wildly off base. The second, while containing a kernel of scientific truth, disregards the fact that oil and dispersants could be toxic to certain animals critical to the food chain even in trace amounts. Moreover, the oil has proven concentrated enough to foul the wetlands and beaches of the Gulf Coast.

5. ?A trickle? On June 8, BP Chief Operating Officer Doug Suttles said that the spill "should be down to a relative trickle by Monday or Tuesday." According to the best scientific estimates, between 10,000 and 35,000 barrels of oil (420,000 to 1.5 million gallons) are still leaking into the Gulf daily.

6. 5,000 barrels a day. Part of the reason for the continued leak is that BP low-balled the flow rate from the well and then refused to try to amend it. For a short time after the blowout, BP estimated that the well beneath the Deepwater Horizon was spewing 1,000 barrels of oil a day into the Gulf. That was swiftly changed to 5,000 barrels daily. Last week, scientists suggested that the real number could be as much as 60,000 barrels a day â?? and no less than 35,000.

In the early days, when 5,000 barrels was the working estimate, BP said: ?We?re not going to take any extra efforts now to calculate flow there at this point. It?s not relevant to the response effort, and it might even detract from the response effort,? a BP spokesman told The New York Times.

As a result of that decision, BP didn?t put enough oil-collecting capacity on the surface. It is now rushing to bring in more to collect the excess 10,000 to 35,000 barrels a day of leaking oil.

7. ?Top kill?: 70 percent chanceThe underestimation of the flow rate mirrors the repeated overestimation by BP of its own capabilities. Hayward said that the failed ?top kill? procedure, which would have stopped the oil, had a 60 to 70 percent chance of working. It failed.

8. ?We have turned the corner.? Earlier, on May 17, BP stuck a siphon into the ruined riser pipe ? collecting 1,000 barrels a day ? leading Hayward to say: "I do feel that we have, for the first time, turned the corner in this challenge." That siphoning effort was later abandoned.

9. What spill? When BP share prices recently plummeted, BP intended to convey the idea that it could handle the costs of the Gulf oil spill. Its statement, however, was obtuse to the point of absurdity: ?The company is not aware of any reason which justifies this share price movement.?

10. Waste of money? Six weeks after the spill began, BP started a $50 million TV ad campaign, promising to restore the Gulf. Obama said the money would have been better spent on relief efforts and damage claims