E60 M5 Discussion The almighty M5. Have you seen one today?

M5 Vs. E55 test drive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-2006, 10:01 AM
  #11  
Members
Thread Starter
 
TV550's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Stream I agree with your post a while back about how the M5 rides very smoooth like the 545 or 550 sedans. If I could get the steering feel of the M5 in a 550 I would go 550 due to gas savings. I definitely dont like active steering after feeling the M5 vs 550. The whole gas issue has got me worried. I know for a high end car of that magnitude gas should be no issue. Its not the money its the time it takes to pull over and fuel up. Its bad enough to pull over once a week but twice to three times a week would really kill me.

for the person that prefers the E55 over the M5 both cars are so close that choosing one over the other does not make you bad. If one car could be so good at everything you would see the other brand cease to exist. But both brands seem to thrive because they fill slightly different niches which is good. Variety is the spice of life.

E55 does have better gas mileage I checked the computer after my test drive with spirited mixed driving and it averaged 15 mpg. The M5 averaged 7 mpg.
Old 01-04-2006, 10:37 AM
  #12  
Senior Members
 
0700700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: sofia / london
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TV550' post='219150' date='Jan 4 2006, 07:01 PM
for the person that prefers the E55 over the M5 both cars are so close that choosing one over the other does not make you bad. If one car could be so good at everything you would see the other brand cease to exist. But both brands seem to thrive because they fill slightly different niches which is good. Variety is the spice of life.

E55 does have better gas mileage I checked the computer after my test drive with spirited mixed driving and it averaged 15 mpg. The M5 averaged 7 mpg.
and as allready discussed the e55 would cost me 75% of the price of an m5 (2nd hand ones)
Old 01-04-2006, 10:40 AM
  #13  
Contributors
 
cobradav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: FLA - East Coast, USA
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: (USA) 645Ci, Silver Gray, Chateau, Cold Weather PKG, Premium Sound PKG, Sport PKG, Step, NAV [Std Equip in 645], HUD, Satellite (SIRIUS) Radio, Aux Input, Bluetooth enabled using iPhone 3GS w/ adapter cradle - Build date - 01/05, Baby delivered 2/24/05
Default

Originally Posted by TV550' post='219150' date='Jan 4 2006, 02:01 PM
Stream I agree with your post a while back about how the M5 rides very smoooth like the 545 or 550 sedans. If I could get the steering feel of the M5 in a 550 I would go 550 due to gas savings. I definitely dont like active steering after feeling the M5 vs 550. The whole gas issue has got me worried. I know for a high end car of that magnitude gas should be no issue. Its not the money its the time it takes to pull over and fuel up. Its bad enough to pull over once a week but twice to three times a week would really kill me.

for the person that prefers the E55 over the M5 both cars are so close that choosing one over the other does not make you bad. If one car could be so good at everything you would see the other brand cease to exist. But both brands seem to thrive because they fill slightly different niches which is good. Variety is the spice of life.

E55 does have better gas mileage I checked the computer after my test drive with spirited mixed driving and it averaged 15 mpg. The M5 averaged 7 mpg.
Yep, as they say, something for everyone. Otherwise we'd have to fit in one car. And if you did get down to one mfr then what would they build then with no competition. I love the choices. Hell, its alot of the fun seeing the differences and similarities. On the AMG special the other night on Speed Channel they said fully half of all AMG production is for USA consumption to the tune of 10,000 cars (E55, CLS55, SL55, SL55 and CLK55). I'm sure the biggest seller was the E55 but they did not say. They also said the "NEW" AMG engine approach will be to go NA. Now I wonder who they might be targeting
Old 01-04-2006, 01:53 PM
  #14  
Members
Thread Starter
 
TV550's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cobradav' post='219159
Stream I agree with your post a while back about how the M5 rides very smoooth like the 545 or 550 sedans. If I could get the steering feel of the M5 in a 550 I would go 550 due to gas savings. I definitely dont like active steering after feeling the M5 vs 550. The whole gas issue has got me worried. I know for a high end car of that magnitude gas should be no issue. Its not the money its the time it takes to pull over and fuel up. Its bad enough to pull over once a week but twice to three times a week would really kill me.

for the person that prefers the E55 over the M5 both cars are so close that choosing one over the other does not make you bad. If one car could be so good at everything you would see the other brand cease to exist. But both brands seem to thrive because they fill slightly different niches which is good. Variety is the spice of life.

E55 does have better gas mileage I checked the computer after my test drive with spirited mixed driving and it averaged 15 mpg. The M5 averaged 7 mpg.
Yep, as they say, something for everyone. Otherwise we'd have to fit in one car. And if you did get down to one mfr then what would they build then with no competition. I love the choices. Hell, its alot of the fun seeing the differences and similarities. On the AMG special the other night on Speed Channel they said fully half of all AMG production is for USA consumption to the tune of 10,000 cars (E55, CLS55, SL55, SL55 and CLK55). I'm sure the biggest seller was the E55 but they did not say. They also said the "NEW" AMG engine approach will be to go NA. Now I wonder who they might be targeting
[/quote]

Yes the new AMG 63 engine will be quite a treat for the AMG cars. They are predicting 500+ naturally aspirated http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Featu...rticleId=106510 Possible they will put this in an E55 late 2006 which would be a worthy adversary to the M5 engine. AMG said they are going away from superchargers due to weight. If my M5 takes to long to get here I might drive the new 63 AMG, but I bet the prices for that E63 will out the roof so I doubt Ill seriously buy it. Supposedly the 63 AMG engine was built from the ground up by AMG itself for the first time without Mercedes providing the block or any parts.
Old 01-04-2006, 04:08 PM
  #15  
Senior Members
 
wolverine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TV550' post='219235
Originally Posted by TV550' post='219150' date='Jan 4 2006, 02:01 PM
Stream I agree with your post a while back about how the M5 rides very smoooth like the 545 or 550 sedans. If I could get the steering feel of the M5 in a 550 I would go 550 due to gas savings. I definitely dont like active steering after feeling the M5 vs 550. The whole gas issue has got me worried. I know for a high end car of that magnitude gas should be no issue. Its not the money its the time it takes to pull over and fuel up. Its bad enough to pull over once a week but twice to three times a week would really kill me.

for the person that prefers the E55 over the M5 both cars are so close that choosing one over the other does not make you bad. If one car could be so good at everything you would see the other brand cease to exist. But both brands seem to thrive because they fill slightly different niches which is good. Variety is the spice of life.

E55 does have better gas mileage I checked the computer after my test drive with spirited mixed driving and it averaged 15 mpg. The M5 averaged 7 mpg.
Yep, as they say, something for everyone. Otherwise we'd have to fit in one car. And if you did get down to one mfr then what would they build then with no competition. I love the choices. Hell, its alot of the fun seeing the differences and similarities. On the AMG special the other night on Speed Channel they said fully half of all AMG production is for USA consumption to the tune of 10,000 cars (E55, CLS55, SL55, SL55 and CLK55). I'm sure the biggest seller was the E55 but they did not say. They also said the "NEW" AMG engine approach will be to go NA. Now I wonder who they might be targeting
Yes the new AMG 63 engine will be quite a treat for the AMG cars. They are predicting 500+ naturally aspirated http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Featu...rticleId=106510 Possible they will put this in an E55 late 2006 which would be a worthy adversary to the M5 engine. AMG said they are going away from superchargers due to weight. If my M5 takes to long to get here I might drive the new 63 AMG, but I bet the prices for that E63 will out the roof so I doubt Ill seriously buy it. Supposedly the 63 AMG engine was built from the ground up by AMG itself for the first time without Mercedes providing the block or any parts.
[/quote]


I just test drove an E55 this afternoon, and it is a very nice, luxurious car. Definitely smoother and more comfortable around town than the M5. Very nice acelleration with very little effort also - just tap the pedal and you're there. You don't really feel the connection with the road though, it's almost like you're a spectator, watching the world fly by. It's a totally different car than the M5 - really a luxury sedan with great performance, but not in the same performance class as the M5.

I felt the acelleration was comparable, up to freeway speeds. Once on the highway, flooring the big benz is just nothing compared to hitting the pedal on the M5 in S6, P500 sport, in third gear. The pulling power of the M5 is just unequalled at that speed. Plus of course, the connection to the road, the curves, the handling - it is really a 'sports car' experience in a luxury sedan.

If I had both in my garage, I'd drive the M5 almost all the time. Why wouldn't you want to drive the car that's just a heck of a lot more fun? But, for lunch with customers, a night out on the town with friends, or for a family drive on the weekend, I'd probably pick the benz. Both are just fantastic, beautifully executed cars.
Old 01-04-2006, 07:55 PM
  #16  
Members
Thread Starter
 
TV550's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wolverine' post='219302
Originally Posted by cobradav' post='219159' date='Jan 4 2006, 11:40 AM
[quote name='TV550' post='219150' date='Jan 4 2006, 02:01 PM']
Stream I agree with your post a while back about how the M5 rides very smoooth like the 545 or 550 sedans. If I could get the steering feel of the M5 in a 550 I would go 550 due to gas savings. I definitely dont like active steering after feeling the M5 vs 550. The whole gas issue has got me worried. I know for a high end car of that magnitude gas should be no issue. Its not the money its the time it takes to pull over and fuel up. Its bad enough to pull over once a week but twice to three times a week would really kill me.

for the person that prefers the E55 over the M5 both cars are so close that choosing one over the other does not make you bad. If one car could be so good at everything you would see the other brand cease to exist. But both brands seem to thrive because they fill slightly different niches which is good. Variety is the spice of life.

E55 does have better gas mileage I checked the computer after my test drive with spirited mixed driving and it averaged 15 mpg. The M5 averaged 7 mpg.
Yep, as they say, something for everyone. Otherwise we'd have to fit in one car. And if you did get down to one mfr then what would they build then with no competition. I love the choices. Hell, its alot of the fun seeing the differences and similarities. On the AMG special the other night on Speed Channel they said fully half of all AMG production is for USA consumption to the tune of 10,000 cars (E55, CLS55, SL55, SL55 and CLK55). I'm sure the biggest seller was the E55 but they did not say. They also said the "NEW" AMG engine approach will be to go NA. Now I wonder who they might be targeting
Yes the new AMG 63 engine will be quite a treat for the AMG cars. They are predicting 500+ naturally aspirated http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Featu...rticleId=106510 Possible they will put this in an E55 late 2006 which would be a worthy adversary to the M5 engine. AMG said they are going away from superchargers due to weight. If my M5 takes to long to get here I might drive the new 63 AMG, but I bet the prices for that E63 will out the roof so I doubt Ill seriously buy it. Supposedly the 63 AMG engine was built from the ground up by AMG itself for the first time without Mercedes providing the block or any parts.
[/quote]


I just test drove an E55 this afternoon, and it is a very nice, luxurious car. Definitely smoother and more comfortable around town than the M5. Very nice acelleration with very little effort also - just tap the pedal and you're there. You don't really feel the connection with the road though, it's almost like you're a spectator, watching the world fly by. It's a totally different car than the M5 - really a luxury sedan with great performance, but not in the same performance class as the M5.

I felt the acelleration was comparable, up to freeway speeds. Once on the highway, flooring the big benz is just nothing compared to hitting the pedal on the M5 in S6, P500 sport, in third gear. The pulling power of the M5 is just unequalled at that speed. Plus of course, the connection to the road, the curves, the handling - it is really a 'sports car' experience in a luxury sedan.

If I had both in my garage, I'd drive the M5 almost all the time. Why wouldn't you want to drive the car that's just a heck of a lot more fun? But, for lunch with customers, a night out on the town with friends, or for a family drive on the weekend, I'd probably pick the benz. Both are just fantastic, beautifully executed cars.
[/quote]

I agree the E55 is a head turner with women as well as men and would be perfect for a night on the town. The M5 is a head turner but for men only. Most women think its just another nice 5 series BMW. When my wife sees a Mercedes whether its stock or 55 series she always says thats a nice car. When she and her friends sees a 525-M5 they just think thats a bmw. I guess you buy the one that gives you the most pleasure.
Old 01-05-2006, 06:16 AM
  #17  
Contributors
 
SolarFactory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Providence, Rhode Island
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2005 545i Titanium Silver/Black/Poplar: Steptronic, Sport, Cold Weather, Premium Sound, Comfort Seats, Sat Radio, NAV & Shades
Default

I don't get how the E55 or any benz is a head turner. Just my opinion but they are all old and farty looking to me. I think BMW is much more cutting edge and daring with their style. I use to like the look of the SL500 but I'm even sick of that. The M5 is way more aggresive looking than the E55 to me. JMHO.....I HATE MERCEDES!!!
Old 01-05-2006, 07:06 AM
  #18  
Senior Members
 
0700700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: sofia / london
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SolarFactory' post='219514' date='Jan 5 2006, 03:16 PM
I don't get how the E55 or any benz is a head turner. Just my opinion but they are all old and farty looking to me. I think BMW is much more cutting edge and daring with their style. I use to like the look of the SL500 but I'm even sick of that. The M5 is way more aggresive looking than the E55 to me. JMHO.....I HATE MERCEDES!!!

i think it has something to do with the fact that to the untrained eye a 5series sport looks 99% like an m5, whereas even with the amg body kit the e-class can not be mistaken for an e55 amg
Old 01-05-2006, 08:00 AM
  #19  
Contributors
 
AC_S5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 3,585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: In a place where the Mercedes density is the highest in the world (no. of MB per square kilometer) I choose a Bimmer, why? because of one thing "The Ultimate Driving Experience" My Ride: 523i Steptronic, Silver Grey Exterior, Black Interior with Black Dakota Leather and Maple Wood Trim. Chrome Grill, Style 123 rim, Airbags everywhere, PDC, Rain sensor, Auto lights, Moveable front armrest, Advance Climate Control, Glass Sunroof, Auto dimming interior and exterior mirror with foldable functions, Extended Lights package, 6 CD changer in glove box, Power seats with memory, Power adjustable steering wheel, Power rear sunblinds. Add ons: 123 wheels, chrome grill, K&N Hi flow filter, Eibach Pro Kit, e60.net decal and 24,000km Past rides: 2001 Nissan Xterra SE 1999 E39 523i 1999 E46 323i 1996 Acura Integra LS
Default

Originally Posted by 700700' post='219533
I don't get how the E55 or any benz is a head turner. Just my opinion but they are all old and farty looking to me. I think BMW is much more cutting edge and daring with their style. I use to like the look of the SL500 but I'm even sick of that. The M5 is way more aggresive looking than the E55 to me. JMHO.....I HATE MERCEDES!!!

i think it has something to do with the fact that to the untrained eye a 5series sport looks 99% like an m5, whereas even with the amg body kit the e-class can not be mistaken for an e55 amg
[/quote]

You are right, MB is for the untrained. So I would never drive one
Old 01-05-2006, 09:57 AM
  #20  
Members
 
michiganM5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TV550' post='219357
Originally Posted by TV550' post='219235' date='Jan 4 2006, 05:53 PM
[quote name='cobradav' post='219159' date='Jan 4 2006, 11:40 AM']
[quote name='TV550' post='219150' date='Jan 4 2006, 02:01 PM']
Stream I agree with your post a while back about how the M5 rides very smoooth like the 545 or 550 sedans. If I could get the steering feel of the M5 in a 550 I would go 550 due to gas savings. I definitely dont like active steering after feeling the M5 vs 550. The whole gas issue has got me worried. I know for a high end car of that magnitude gas should be no issue. Its not the money its the time it takes to pull over and fuel up. Its bad enough to pull over once a week but twice to three times a week would really kill me.

for the person that prefers the E55 over the M5 both cars are so close that choosing one over the other does not make you bad. If one car could be so good at everything you would see the other brand cease to exist. But both brands seem to thrive because they fill slightly different niches which is good. Variety is the spice of life.

E55 does have better gas mileage I checked the computer after my test drive with spirited mixed driving and it averaged 15 mpg. The M5 averaged 7 mpg.
Yep, as they say, something for everyone. Otherwise we'd have to fit in one car. And if you did get down to one mfr then what would they build then with no competition. I love the choices. Hell, its alot of the fun seeing the differences and similarities. On the AMG special the other night on Speed Channel they said fully half of all AMG production is for USA consumption to the tune of 10,000 cars (E55, CLS55, SL55, SL55 and CLK55). I'm sure the biggest seller was the E55 but they did not say. They also said the "NEW" AMG engine approach will be to go NA. Now I wonder who they might be targeting
Yes the new AMG 63 engine will be quite a treat for the AMG cars. They are predicting 500+ naturally aspirated http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Featu...rticleId=106510 Possible they will put this in an E55 late 2006 which would be a worthy adversary to the M5 engine. AMG said they are going away from superchargers due to weight. If my M5 takes to long to get here I might drive the new 63 AMG, but I bet the prices for that E63 will out the roof so I doubt Ill seriously buy it. Supposedly the 63 AMG engine was built from the ground up by AMG itself for the first time without Mercedes providing the block or any parts.
[/quote]


I just test drove an E55 this afternoon, and it is a very nice, luxurious car. Definitely smoother and more comfortable around town than the M5. Very nice acelleration with very little effort also - just tap the pedal and you're there. You don't really feel the connection with the road though, it's almost like you're a spectator, watching the world fly by. It's a totally different car than the M5 - really a luxury sedan with great performance, but not in the same performance class as the M5.

I felt the acelleration was comparable, up to freeway speeds. Once on the highway, flooring the big benz is just nothing compared to hitting the pedal on the M5 in S6, P500 sport, in third gear. The pulling power of the M5 is just unequalled at that speed. Plus of course, the connection to the road, the curves, the handling - it is really a 'sports car' experience in a luxury sedan.

If I had both in my garage, I'd drive the M5 almost all the time. Why wouldn't you want to drive the car that's just a heck of a lot more fun? But, for lunch with customers, a night out on the town with friends, or for a family drive on the weekend, I'd probably pick the benz. Both are just fantastic, beautifully executed cars.
[/quote]

I agree the E55 is a head turner with women as well as men and would be perfect for a night on the town. The M5 is a head turner but for men only. Most women think its just another nice 5 series BMW. When my wife sees a Mercedes whether its stock or 55 series she always says thats a nice car. When she and her friends sees a 525-M5 they just think thats a bmw. I guess you buy the one that gives you the most pleasure.
[/quote]

You are correct. The M5 is 100% a "guys" car. When I brought my M5 home from the dealership my wife looked at it and said, "that's what you get for $95,000? It looks just like our neighbors (525)." A few days after that we went to a party with quite a few people in attendance and it was very intersting to see the difference between when a women walks by the car as compared to a man. The women who noticed the car looked at it as if it was just a nice, clean, black bimmer. When it came to the men it was a different story as they did a few circles around it, peaked inside, got on one knee looking under the rear of the car, etc. It is certainly a "guys" car and that is just the way I like it.

Cheers


Quick Reply: M5 Vs. E55 test drive



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:30 PM.