![]() |
Here's a technical question for the gearheads among us:
I know that higher compression motors require premium fuel because it is less volatile, meaning that it is less likely to burn prematurely. As a fuel's octane rating goes down, it is more likely to cause premature combustion (knocking), and this will lead to reduced performance, and reduced fuel efficiency. I also know that modern engines have built-in countermeasures that will compensate for knocking by retarding the valve timing (or something like that). Here's the question, will these countermeasures reduce the life of the motor in the long-term? If not, what are the drawbacks of using lower octane fuel other than reduced performance and efficiency? |
is the difference between 91 and 87 something youd like to really worry about.
Use 91, and forget it. There are more important things to attend to in life besides gas. |
Originally Posted by PraiseTheLowered
(Post 1138880)
is the difference between 91 and 87 something youd like to really worry about.
Use 91, and forget it. There are more important things to attend to in life besides gas. Well said. :lol: |
Originally Posted by kajin99
(Post 1138828)
Here's a technical question for the gearheads among us:
I know that higher compression motors require premium fuel because it is less volatile, meaning that it is less likely to burn prematurely. As a fuel's octane rating goes down, it is more likely to cause premature combustion (knocking), and this will lead to reduced performance, and reduced fuel efficiency. I also know that modern engines have built-in countermeasures that will compensate for knocking by retarding the valve timing (or something like that). Here's the question, will these countermeasures reduce the life of the motor in the long-term? If not, what are the drawbacks of using lower octane fuel other than reduced performance and efficiency? 2-No other drawbacks that aren't subjective |
I currently use 98 and the drive is much smoother. And, if you use 98 compared to a 91, then you get more distance (proven using BP Ultimate). So, at the end of the day, the price is about the same if you think about it... pay $0.10 more and get more distance than the 91 + smoother drive etc.
|
I live in IL. price difference between 87 and 93 octane fuel is .30c per gallon. I am getting about 330 miles per fuel tank on average. That gives about 45 fill ups a Year with average 15K miles per year. Usually it will be about 16 gallons of fuel per fill up. 16 gallons times 0.3c is $4.80 let's say $5 even. At 45 fill ups it comes to $225 a year, and that is with driving 15K miles per year! Don't we have a bigger problems to worry about? :lol: Just use the right fuel. It won't hurt.
|
i'm gonna pump some e85 in the 5er and see how that affects performance
i hear your mileage is reduced i'll report back this could save you 30 cents a gallon |
Are you worried about the long term effect on your wallet? It's about $3-$5 per tank full difference. I just went through this with my mother-in-law. She has a $50K car, and she is worried about $3/tank full?!!!
|
Let's see, long term effects of using lower grade gas? How about not having engine repairs covered even if you are under warranty. The owners manual does not say "91 or Premium octeane recommended" it says "required", which to me means using lower octane fuel can give the dealer a reason not to cover a repair even if the warranty is still active. Other than that? You're good :twoup: I use the highest octane available, which for me (SoCal) is 91.
|
Originally Posted by porshah
(Post 1138927)
Are you worried about the long term effect on your wallet? It's about $3-$5 per tank full difference. I just went through this with my mother-in-law. She has a $50K car, and she is worried about $3/tank full?!!!
Sorry, one of my pet peeves. I digress. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:13 PM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands