5Series.net - Forums

5Series.net - Forums (https://5series.net/forums/)
-   E60 Discussion (https://5series.net/forums/e60-discussion-2/)
-   -   Long-term effects of using < 91 octane fuel (https://5series.net/forums/e60-discussion-2/long-term-effects-using-91-octane-fuel-96056/)

kajin99 Mar 26, 2010 06:08 AM

Here's a technical question for the gearheads among us:

I know that higher compression motors require premium fuel because it is less volatile, meaning that it is less likely to burn prematurely. As a fuel's octane rating goes down, it is more likely to cause premature combustion (knocking), and this will lead to reduced performance, and reduced fuel efficiency.

I also know that modern engines have built-in countermeasures that will compensate for knocking by retarding the valve timing (or something like that).

Here's the question, will these countermeasures reduce the life of the motor in the long-term? If not, what are the drawbacks of using lower octane fuel other than reduced performance and efficiency?

PraiseTheLowered Mar 26, 2010 06:57 AM

is the difference between 91 and 87 something youd like to really worry about.

Use 91, and forget it. There are more important things to attend to in life besides gas.

theXman Mar 26, 2010 07:00 AM


Originally Posted by PraiseTheLowered (Post 1138880)
is the difference between 91 and 87 something youd like to really worry about.

Use 91, and forget it. There are more important things to attend to in life besides gas.


Well said. :lol:

pukka Mar 26, 2010 07:05 AM


Originally Posted by kajin99 (Post 1138828)
Here's a technical question for the gearheads among us:

I know that higher compression motors require premium fuel because it is less volatile, meaning that it is less likely to burn prematurely. As a fuel's octane rating goes down, it is more likely to cause premature combustion (knocking), and this will lead to reduced performance, and reduced fuel efficiency.

I also know that modern engines have built-in countermeasures that will compensate for knocking by retarding the valve timing (or something like that).

Here's the question, will these countermeasures reduce the life of the motor in the long-term? If not, what are the drawbacks of using lower octane fuel other than reduced performance and efficiency?

1-No
2-No other drawbacks that aren't subjective

SSRL_2006 Mar 26, 2010 07:23 AM

I currently use 98 and the drive is much smoother. And, if you use 98 compared to a 91, then you get more distance (proven using BP Ultimate). So, at the end of the day, the price is about the same if you think about it... pay $0.10 more and get more distance than the 91 + smoother drive etc.

rafichicago Mar 26, 2010 07:42 AM

I live in IL. price difference between 87 and 93 octane fuel is .30c per gallon. I am getting about 330 miles per fuel tank on average. That gives about 45 fill ups a Year with average 15K miles per year. Usually it will be about 16 gallons of fuel per fill up. 16 gallons times 0.3c is $4.80 let's say $5 even. At 45 fill ups it comes to $225 a year, and that is with driving 15K miles per year! Don't we have a bigger problems to worry about? :lol: Just use the right fuel. It won't hurt.

-Mike- Mar 26, 2010 07:48 AM

i'm gonna pump some e85 in the 5er and see how that affects performance

i hear your mileage is reduced

i'll report back

this could save you 30 cents a gallon

porshah Mar 26, 2010 07:50 AM

Are you worried about the long term effect on your wallet? It's about $3-$5 per tank full difference. I just went through this with my mother-in-law. She has a $50K car, and she is worried about $3/tank full?!!!

pjinca Mar 26, 2010 07:51 AM

Let's see, long term effects of using lower grade gas? How about not having engine repairs covered even if you are under warranty. The owners manual does not say "91 or Premium octeane recommended" it says "required", which to me means using lower octane fuel can give the dealer a reason not to cover a repair even if the warranty is still active. Other than that? You're good :twoup: I use the highest octane available, which for me (SoCal) is 91.

bha7176 Mar 26, 2010 08:12 AM


Originally Posted by porshah (Post 1138927)
Are you worried about the long term effect on your wallet? It's about $3-$5 per tank full difference. I just went through this with my mother-in-law. She has a $50K car, and she is worried about $3/tank full?!!!

and that kind of logic, my friend, is why the price of fuel in general, and taxes, are going to keep creeping up and up, cent by cent, for no other reason than they can and guys like you say whats the difference, it's only $3 per tank. Or so what, my taxes are only going to increase by $100 a year - no big deal.



Sorry, one of my pet peeves. I digress.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:13 PM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands