Cx vs Speed
#1
Senior Members
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 535d
Model Year: E61 2006
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The sedan has 0,28 of Cx and the touring 0,30. This is the numbers given by BMW but what about the M exterior package? Will it have the same Cx? How much will improve the Cx by lowering the car, about 35mm (eibach)?
#3
Senior Members
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The difference is going to be minimal at most, and unless you plan on significantly surpassing speeds of 155mph the slight difference isn't going to matter at all.
#4
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I haven't seen the Cx for the M pack, but I bet that Cx will be worst than with the standard pack. Aero packs are normally designed to provide more downforce, and you can only increase downforce if drag is higher, ie. Cx increases.
For a E60, a 0.01 increase or decrease in Cx means aprox. 3 Km/h difference at very high speeds (200Km/h).
For a E60, a 0.01 increase or decrease in Cx means aprox. 3 Km/h difference at very high speeds (200Km/h).
#5
Members
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2005 BMW-Alpina B5 Touring #007, Malachite Green w/ Caramel Individual interior
1999 BMW 840Ci Sport Individual, Techno Violet w/ Champagne Individual interior
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Bizarrely, with the Alpina aerokit on both, the factory guys were able to run the B5 Touring to a higher top speed at Nardo than the B5 saloon... If you want to reduce Cd vs the SE, the Alpina kit will be more effective than the M-Sport kit, I'd expect - the Alpina kit was specifically developed for a 200mph-capable car, after all.
I believe the B5 sedan has a Cd of 0.29, but bear in mind it has 245/275 tyres and a bigger diff hanging in the underbody air.
I believe the B5 sedan has a Cd of 0.29, but bear in mind it has 245/275 tyres and a bigger diff hanging in the underbody air.
#6
Senior Members
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 535d
Model Year: E61 2006
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
At 180mph the difference of 0.02Cx means 25hp and 7km/h
About drag vs downforce, correct me if i'm wrong but, if you lowered a car you will improve the downforce (you will have less air flow under the car, this will reduce the lift and it will improve the downforce), but you will improve the drag too (lower drag and higher downforce), or not?
As for the alpina B5 sedan with a Cx of 0.29, the original sedan has a better Cx (0.28). I bet that Alpina may have a much better downforce with only 0.01Cx of sacrifice.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://5series.net/forums/images/smilies/imported/rolleyes.gif)
As for the alpina B5 sedan with a Cx of 0.29, the original sedan has a better Cx (0.28). I bet that Alpina may have a much better downforce with only 0.01Cx of sacrifice.
#7
Members
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2005 BMW-Alpina B5 Touring #007, Malachite Green w/ Caramel Individual interior
1999 BMW 840Ci Sport Individual, Techno Violet w/ Champagne Individual interior
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Tiago' post='339143' date='Sep 27 2006, 12:01 PM
As for the alpina B5 sedan with a Cx of 0.29, the original sedan has a better Cx (0.28). I bet that Alpina may have a much better downforce with only 0.01Cx of sacrifice.
The more interesting figure across a broad range of cars is CdA, anyway, rather than purely Cd/Cx - the resistance is a multiple of the frontal area (A) and the drag coefficient (Cd)
#8
Senior Members
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think the bottom line here, is that unless Tiago is trying to break some land speed records in an E60, he probably should worry about how much the drag is going to change on his car. He's really only going to be gaining 2-5mph if he's lucky or losing 2-5mph if his unlucky, and I don't know about you guys, but I still haven't even attempted to hit top speed in my car yet.
#9
Members
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2005 BMW-Alpina B5 Touring #007, Malachite Green w/ Caramel Individual interior
1999 BMW 840Ci Sport Individual, Techno Violet w/ Champagne Individual interior
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Heiss5' post='339211' date='Sep 27 2006, 04:56 PM
I think the bottom line here, is that unless Tiago is trying to break some land speed records in an E60, he probably should worry about how much the drag is going to change on his car. He's really only going to be gaining 2-5mph if he's lucky or losing 2-5mph if his unlucky, and I don't know about you guys, but I still haven't even attempted to hit top speed in my car yet.
I've hit an indicated 175mph before I ran out of (clear) road - car was still pulling like a proverbial train.
#10
Senior Members
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://5series.net/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by hythe' post='339213' date='Sep 27 2006, 09:02 AM
Really? No fun...
I've hit an indicated 175mph before I ran out of (clear) road - car was still pulling like a proverbial train.
I've hit an indicated 175mph before I ran out of (clear) road - car was still pulling like a proverbial train.