E60 Discussion Anything and everything to do with the E60 5 Series. All are welcome!

Cx vs Speed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-2006, 11:23 AM
  #1  
Senior Members
Thread Starter
 
Tiago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 535d
Model Year: E61 2006
Default

The sedan has 0,28 of Cx and the touring 0,30. This is the numbers given by BMW but what about the M exterior package? Will it have the same Cx? How much will improve the Cx by lowering the car, about 35mm (eibach)?
Old 09-26-2006, 12:32 PM
  #2  
Senior Members
 
ImolaRedM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Seattle, WA Metro Area
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not sure if Cd (Cx) data is available with the aero kit.
Old 09-26-2006, 12:42 PM
  #3  
Senior Members
 
Heiss5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The difference is going to be minimal at most, and unless you plan on significantly surpassing speeds of 155mph the slight difference isn't going to matter at all.
Old 09-26-2006, 03:28 PM
  #4  
JMB
Members
 
JMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I haven't seen the Cx for the M pack, but I bet that Cx will be worst than with the standard pack. Aero packs are normally designed to provide more downforce, and you can only increase downforce if drag is higher, ie. Cx increases.

For a E60, a 0.01 increase or decrease in Cx means aprox. 3 Km/h difference at very high speeds (200Km/h).
Old 09-26-2006, 09:26 PM
  #5  
Members
 
hythe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2005 BMW-Alpina B5 Touring #007, Malachite Green w/ Caramel Individual interior 1999 BMW 840Ci Sport Individual, Techno Violet w/ Champagne Individual interior
Default

Bizarrely, with the Alpina aerokit on both, the factory guys were able to run the B5 Touring to a higher top speed at Nardo than the B5 saloon... If you want to reduce Cd vs the SE, the Alpina kit will be more effective than the M-Sport kit, I'd expect - the Alpina kit was specifically developed for a 200mph-capable car, after all.

I believe the B5 sedan has a Cd of 0.29, but bear in mind it has 245/275 tyres and a bigger diff hanging in the underbody air.
Old 09-27-2006, 03:01 AM
  #6  
Senior Members
Thread Starter
 
Tiago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 535d
Model Year: E61 2006
Default

At 180mph the difference of 0.02Cx means 25hp and 7km/h About drag vs downforce, correct me if i'm wrong but, if you lowered a car you will improve the downforce (you will have less air flow under the car, this will reduce the lift and it will improve the downforce), but you will improve the drag too (lower drag and higher downforce), or not?
As for the alpina B5 sedan with a Cx of 0.29, the original sedan has a better Cx (0.28). I bet that Alpina may have a much better downforce with only 0.01Cx of sacrifice.
Old 09-27-2006, 06:18 AM
  #7  
Members
 
hythe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2005 BMW-Alpina B5 Touring #007, Malachite Green w/ Caramel Individual interior 1999 BMW 840Ci Sport Individual, Techno Violet w/ Champagne Individual interior
Default

Originally Posted by Tiago' post='339143' date='Sep 27 2006, 12:01 PM
As for the alpina B5 sedan with a Cx of 0.29, the original sedan has a better Cx (0.28). I bet that Alpina may have a much better downforce with only 0.01Cx of sacrifice.
Quite possibly true - but also the SE figure of 0.28 wasn't measured while the car was wearing Alpina-sized tyres...

The more interesting figure across a broad range of cars is CdA, anyway, rather than purely Cd/Cx - the resistance is a multiple of the frontal area (A) and the drag coefficient (Cd)
Old 09-27-2006, 07:56 AM
  #8  
Senior Members
 
Heiss5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the bottom line here, is that unless Tiago is trying to break some land speed records in an E60, he probably should worry about how much the drag is going to change on his car. He's really only going to be gaining 2-5mph if he's lucky or losing 2-5mph if his unlucky, and I don't know about you guys, but I still haven't even attempted to hit top speed in my car yet.
Old 09-27-2006, 08:02 AM
  #9  
Members
 
hythe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ride: 2005 BMW-Alpina B5 Touring #007, Malachite Green w/ Caramel Individual interior 1999 BMW 840Ci Sport Individual, Techno Violet w/ Champagne Individual interior
Default

Originally Posted by Heiss5' post='339211' date='Sep 27 2006, 04:56 PM
I think the bottom line here, is that unless Tiago is trying to break some land speed records in an E60, he probably should worry about how much the drag is going to change on his car. He's really only going to be gaining 2-5mph if he's lucky or losing 2-5mph if his unlucky, and I don't know about you guys, but I still haven't even attempted to hit top speed in my car yet.
Really? No fun...

I've hit an indicated 175mph before I ran out of (clear) road - car was still pulling like a proverbial train.
Old 09-27-2006, 08:12 AM
  #10  
Senior Members
 
Heiss5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hythe' post='339213' date='Sep 27 2006, 09:02 AM
Really? No fun...

I've hit an indicated 175mph before I ran out of (clear) road - car was still pulling like a proverbial train.
Yes but you have the Alpina B5, your car can actually go that fast. I've hit slightly upward of 100 a couple times, but I've never really gone for it. I don't know why not, just waiting for my Bugatti I guess...


Quick Reply: Cx vs Speed



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:26 PM.