Compare 166's vs. 172's
06-19-2008, 11:00 PM
#11
Contributors
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess you guys know where I stand... 166 
Also BMW has implemented a "Bad-Road" package for all BMW's assembled in India which includes raising the car to deal with the horrible roads - thats why some of you are getting the "jacked up" impression.
I always though the 172's look like they belong on the Benz.. not on a BMW
Also BMW has implemented a "Bad-Road" package for all BMW's assembled in India which includes raising the car to deal with the horrible roads - thats why some of you are getting the "jacked up" impression.
I always though the 172's look like they belong on the Benz.. not on a BMW
06-20-2008, 04:22 AM
#12
Senior Members
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2004 545i TITANIUM GREY II on Black Dakota Lthr, Comfort Seats, Sports PKG, Premium PKG, Active/Dynamic Drive, NAV, Winter Package.
Guys don't forget the M166 are on a non sports package. The sports suspension does lower the car a bit in the front.
Originally Posted by Suchet' post='606485' date='Jun 20 2008, 03:00 AM
I guess you guys know where I stand... 166
Also BMW has implemented a "Bad-Road" package for all BMW's assembled in India which includes raising the car to deal with the horrible roads - thats why some of you are getting the "jacked up" impression.
I always though the 172's look like they belong on the Benz.. not on a BMW
Also BMW has implemented a "Bad-Road" package for all BMW's assembled in India which includes raising the car to deal with the horrible roads - thats why some of you are getting the "jacked up" impression.
I always though the 172's look like they belong on the Benz.. not on a BMW
06-20-2008, 05:15 AM
#13
Senior Members
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2008 BMW 550i Sport
Carbon Black Metallic/Cream Beige
Manny tranny and other stuff
Recently gone, but never forgotten:
2005 Ford Mustang GT (hence the name)
Torch Red/Crimson
Manny tranny and every option available for that year
2002 Chrysler 300M Special
Brilliant Black/Light Taupe/Dark Slate
Autostick and goo-gobs of neat features that I will sorely miss
Originally Posted by Moopai' post='606553' date='Jun 20 2008, 08:22 AM
Guys don't forget the M166 are on a non sports package. ...
172s FTW!!
166s look better on an M5.
07-19-2008, 07:49 AM
#15
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 7,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: My ex-ride: EU '08 LCI 520dA. Space Grey, Sport Seats in Black Leather/Fabric Anthracite, Sport Steering Wheel, A/C with Extended Features, Hi-Fi Speakers, Cup Holders, Cruise with Braking function, Folding Rear Seats, Xenons, Park Distance Control.
More comments, please.
I think they both look
By lowering the cars, they would look even better.
(I'm not going to lower mine, I love the comfort!)
I think they both look
By lowering the cars, they would look even better.
(I'm not going to lower mine, I love the comfort!)
07-20-2008, 06:37 AM
#17
Members
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i prefer the 166s, again biased as I have them, I like how they almost immediately start sweeping into the hub as opposed to looking flat then dropping into the hub. It is really dramatic when you are walking to your car in a parking lot or driveway and look at those wheels. I have the sport suspension, but non-sport vs. non-sport still 166s.
07-20-2008, 06:41 AM
#18
Senior Members
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2004 545i TITANIUM GREY II on Black Dakota Lthr, Comfort Seats, Sports PKG, Premium PKG, Active/Dynamic Drive, NAV, Winter Package.
I like the 166s but I agree the car is pretty high, if this was the sports package they would've look better.
Originally Posted by Ricracing' post='627919' date='Jul 19 2008, 11:49 AM
More comments, please.
I think they both look
By lowering the cars, they would look even better.
(I'm not going to lower mine, I love the comfort!)
I think they both look
By lowering the cars, they would look even better.
(I'm not going to lower mine, I love the comfort!)
07-20-2008, 06:48 AM
#20
Senior Members
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: 2006 530i.... Saphire Black Metallic...19 inch Axis Milanos....Auburn dakota interior.....ACS rear lip spoiler... And a whole lot of head turns ;)
I like the 166's the concave look to them are fabulous!
But I must admit, you need the M Tech Kit for them to really stand out!
But I must admit, you need the M Tech Kit for them to really stand out!