3.0 LITRE "N52"
#1
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Proud citizen of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MORGANTOWN, W.V.
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: '05 530i, Premium, Steptronic, Logic7, Silver grey-black leather. Build date 12/7/04.
Please forgive me is this has been discussed before. My lease will be up about one year from now, and I'll be leasing an'08. Will BMW NA no longer be offering us the normally aspirated 255 HP engine? Will our choice in sixes be limited to the 535i and 528i as is the case with the 3-Series? I would much prefer the non-turbo 255 HP six, but it looks as though we here in the U.S. we will continue to be limited in engine options if this is the case. Thanks!
#2
Contributors
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 7,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: My ex-ride: EU '08 LCI 520dA. Space Grey, Sport Seats in Black Leather/Fabric Anthracite, Sport Steering Wheel, A/C with Extended Features, Hi-Fi Speakers, Cup Holders, Cruise with Braking function, Folding Rear Seats, Xenons, Park Distance Control.
Originally Posted by niktee' post='348704' date='Oct 25 2006, 04:37 PM
Please forgive me is this has been discussed before. My lease will be up about one year from now, and I'll be leasing an'08. Will BMW NA no longer be offering us the normally aspirated 255 HP engine? Will our choice in sixes be limited to the 535i and 528i as is the case with the 3-Series? I would much prefer the non-turbo 255 HP six, but it looks as though we here in the U.S. we will continue to be limited in engine options if this is the case. Thanks!
#3
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Proud citizen of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MORGANTOWN, W.V.
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: '05 530i, Premium, Steptronic, Logic7, Silver grey-black leather. Build date 12/7/04.
Originally Posted by Ricracing' post='348709' date='Oct 25 2006, 09:54 AM
In Europe the new 3 litre engine will have 272 hp as in the new E92 330Ci.
#4
Senior Members
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: '05 545i - scheduled for ED pickup in Munich on 7/22!
why don't you like the turbo?
its faster than the normally aspirated engine and with a few simple mods you'll be putting down 350hp to the wheels.
its faster than the normally aspirated engine and with a few simple mods you'll be putting down 350hp to the wheels.
#5
Contributors
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 7,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: My ex-ride: EU '08 LCI 520dA. Space Grey, Sport Seats in Black Leather/Fabric Anthracite, Sport Steering Wheel, A/C with Extended Features, Hi-Fi Speakers, Cup Holders, Cruise with Braking function, Folding Rear Seats, Xenons, Park Distance Control.
Originally Posted by niktee' post='348791' date='Oct 25 2006, 09:47 PM
For some reason, BMW North America makes, in my opinion, bad choices for us. One example, do away with the sweet new N52 3.0 engine in coupes and sedans, and only make it available in the SUV's. Then, we must choose from the "3.5" turbo, or the de-tuned N52 "2.8". Rediculous!
You do not have the fine diesels either...
#6
Senior Members
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Seattle, WA Metro Area
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jet190rs' post='348796' date='Oct 25 2006, 02:54 PM
why don't you like the turbo?
#7
Senior Members
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Seattle, WA Metro Area
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ricracing' post='348801' date='Oct 25 2006, 03:01 PM
Just wait for the facelift facts for the E60!
#8
Contributors
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Proud citizen of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MORGANTOWN, W.V.
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ride: '05 530i, Premium, Steptronic, Logic7, Silver grey-black leather. Build date 12/7/04.
I'm not opposed to the turbo . I just like the overall fuel economy/performance/smoothness of the new 530. I just don't need the benefits of the turbo, and won't settle for a de-tuned 230 HP version. It just sucks(the choice we have).
#9
Senior Members
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Seattle, WA Metro Area
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by niktee' post='348818' date='Oct 25 2006, 03:42 PM
It just sucks(the choice we have).
#10
Contributors
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I believe the EPA rating for the 335 (same engine you're talking about) is 22 and 29. So essentially the same fuel economy as the current 530, but with alot more fun. All the mags are reporting very little turbo lag.